2017 State of Regulation Crowdfunding Report

The 2017 State of Regulation Crowdfunding –
U.S. Securities-based Crowdfunding Under
Title III of the JOBS Act[1]

Regulation Crowdfunding allows startups and SMEs to raise up to $1,070,000 per year from both retail and accredited investors by utilizing registered funding portals (or broker-dealers) to conduct exempt offerings online. This exemption requires issuers to file in a Form C and post online disclosures about a company’s operations, team, financials and other material information for investors to review. Regulation Crowdfunding started in the United States on May 16, 2016. The second calendar year for the industry ended on December 31, 2017. Because data about issuers, their financial wellbeing, and the capital that is committed is public information we can analyze the data and bring transparency to a segment of the markets (exempt private offerings) that has been fairly opaque until the JOBS Act went into effect.

Show me the CCLEAR Regulation Crowdfunding Dashboard

Key findings:

• The number of unique offerings increased 267%[2] from 178 in 2016 to 481 in 2017
• Proceeds increased 178% from $27.6 million in 2016 to $49.2 million in 2017. Total proceeds by the end of 2017 was $76.8 million
• The number of successful offerings increased 202% from 99 in 2016 to 200 in 2017
• The average success rate of offerings to date is 66.7%
• The total number of investors in Regulation Crowdfunding increased 158% from 28,180 in 2016 to 44,433 in 2017
• Issuers that filed annual reports and reported creating jobs created on average 13.9 jobs.
• Revenues for Issuers that filed annual reports increased on average 131% between the year in which they leveraged Regulation Crowdfunding and the Prior Fiscal Year.

Analysis:

• The results of this data show that the market, while still in its infancy, is growing at a rapid pace.
• The velocity of capital into funded offerings appears to be steady without showing signs of abnormal activity or irrational investor behavior.
• The rapid increase in the number of offerings and investors proves that there is appetite for Regulation Crowdfunding from both issuers seeking capital as well as investors looking to diversify.
• Given the high success rate for offerings, Regulation Crowdfunding represents a very structured yet viable alternative for access to capital for startups and SMEs.
  Given the ability for firms to leverage capital raised to scale operations and create jobs, Regulation Crowdfunding should be promoted by local Chambers as well as the Small Business Administration.
  Given the lack of irregularities or fraud, Regulation Crowdfunding (and the structure under which it provides for transparency), should be advocated by policy makers and government organizations.

Conclusion:
2017 represented a strong first complete calendar year for Regulation Crowdfunding. We expect the industry to exceed $100M in funded offerings during the first quarter of 2018. When considering the growth of securities-crowdfunding globally, we expect the market to reach $1B in funded offerings within the next 5 years. This can be further supported by making adjustments to the exemption that would allow for greater issuer caps.

In looking for how to consider the growth rate and size of this market over time, one can look at the UK market for data. With now 5 years of active equity crowdfunding in the UK, according to Cambridge University’s Center for Alternative Finance, in 2017, 17% of all seed stage capital in the UK came via equity crowdfunding. The CCLEAR database will continue to track these markets both domestically and globally as we begin to offer services to other regulators outside of the United States.

Download the full report here.

[purchase_link id=”2748″ style=”” color=”” text=”Purchase”]

[1] This report is an excerpt of a report we wrote for the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that summarizes the year end cumulative results for Title III of the JOBS Act (aka Regulation Crowdfunding)
Show me the CCLEAR Regulation Crowdfunding Dashboard

[2] Given Regulation Crowdfunding started on May 16, 2016, the first calendar year of Regulation Crowdfunding only encompasses 7 ½ months. Had it been a full calendar year, this growth percent would have likely been lower.

10 reasons the $1 million crowdfunding cap should be $20 million

The following is a piece we wrote for VentureBeat. The original can be found here.

10 reasons the $1 million crowdfunding cap should be raised to $20 million

It’s been18 months since the final rule of the JOBS Act went into effect, allowing equity crowdfunding. In those 18 months, everything proponents of the rule said would happen (and none of what the detractors said would happen) has become a reality. Over $82 million dollars of previously untapped capital from local investors has been committed to over 650 companies. No fraud has been perpetrated. And everyone (including investors, the Government, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the media) has more insight into the private capital markets than has ever existed before, bringing a new level of transparency, accountability, and data analysis. This is the time to raise the maximum a company can raise from $1 million to $20 million.

Why? Entrepreneurs all across America are finally raising funds faster than they could through traditional channels. Investors now have a transparent and efficient way to support local businesses that they love and believe in by receiving information about these offerings online. Regulators have transparency into the private capital markets, an auditable trail of disclosures, and a digital footprint full of data. And our government has a jobs engine, a way to promote women- and minority-run businesses, an economic booster, and a tax engine. Not bad!

So if it’s working, why raise the cap to $20 million? Let me explain:

1. We can make it a bigger jobs engine. Data from companies that have been successful with an equity crowdfunding offering shows they hire on average 2.7 people within 90 days of a $300,000 raise. That’s about one job per every $100,000 raised. If we increase the cap to $20 million, that could equate to 200 new jobs for each issuer that raises $20 million. So raising the cap would make equity crowdfunding the Main Street jobs engine we expected it to be.

2. It will provide regulators with more transparency. Companies that raise money via equity crowdfunding file specific disclosures about their businesses, their operations, and their financial wellbeing. All of this is digitally recorded, and For the first time in 80 years, regulators can actually see where capital is flowing in the private capital markets, which can allow them to further protect investors. Increasing the limit to $20 million will attract larger firms that seek more capital down this public path. This means regulators AND investors will have real-time actionable visibility into a larger part of the private capital markets.

3. Startups can make a bigger impact. $1 million dollars is nice, but consider how much more a company can do with $20 million. Increasing the cap doesn’t mean every company would get $20 million (currently only about 50 percent of companies are successful with their campaigns and raise on average $300,000), but those that are worthy and can win over the support of the crowd can take on much greater goals.

4. Communities will get more engaged. Want to know how to engage local communities? Make them investors in the local businesses that are not just mom and pop shops but large employers and high-growth startups. They will have a vested stake in the performance of those companies, and by default these businesses will benefit from the marketing power of the community. Increasing the cap to $20 million gives local investors a greater stake in their local communities. Research shows that money invested locally circulates in the local economy rather than being sucked out.

5. We’ll see gender and minority benefits. Data my firm has been collecting proves that equity crowdfunding is democratizing access to capital among women- and minority-founded businesses. Increasing the cap to $20 million means more capital to this underserved group of founders.

6. Investors can diversify their portfolios. Increasing the cap to $20 million will give investors the ability to diversify more into their own communities. This doesn’t mean they should take all their investments out of the public markets, but why not put it into a local company that might be less likely to be impacted by fluctuating oil and commodity prices?

7. More data analytics. More data online means more opportunity to analyze it and present it to consumers of media. This data analytics can educate new issuers, give investors more opportunities to compare companies in similar industries and show our government where the greatest economic impact is taking place.

8. It will fix Title IV, Tier I of the JOBS Act. Title IV, Tier I allows companies to raise up to $20 million online from both retail and accredited investors but requires state review. Getting one state approval is slow and cumbersome. 50 is nearly impossible and insanely costly. Increasing the limit to $20 million will solve this problem and still provide state regulators information, disclosures, and data on all companies raising money from investors in their state.

9. It will allow the platforms to experience their true potential. Platforms are playing the role of intermediary incredibly well. As an extra benefit, they are acting as a vetting mechanism, only listing deals that meet minimum criteria and working to make sure issuers provide full and robust disclosures. Increasing the limit to $20 million will further enable these platforms to play this vital role and earn the fees to help support their operations.

10. Address the emerging blockchain/ICO nightmares. Let’s face it, there is a lot of uncertainty about blockchain and ICOs from regulators and Washington. This is particularly true given the amount of capital flowing through this unregulated industry. Increasing the cap to $20 million will allow ICO issuers that wish to sell security tokens on the blockchain a regulated process to follow. The emerging ICO marketplace would have an approved regulatory process to follow, giving blockchain startups the opportunity to sell their security tokens and give investors confidence that they aren’t risking their capital without some recourse.

Let’s not wait. The SEC should update the amount now or Congress should intervene to do so.

Sherwood Neiss is a partner at Crowdfund Capital Advisors. He helped lead the U.S. fight to legalize debt and equity based crowdfunding and coauthored the book Crowdfund Investing for Dummies.

CCA/World Bank Announce the Publication of Crowdfunding’s Potential in the Caribbean

From the forward written by Bryan Zhang Co-Founder and Interim Executive Director Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance:

“Following their trailblazing work on Crowdfunding’s Potential for the Developing World (infoDev,2013), the authors of this report [Crowdfund Capital Advisors] carried out empirical research to assess the potential of crowdfunding in the Caribbean. It focuses on the prerequisite ‘building blocks’ for a thriving crowdfunding ecosystem – user capacity, laws and regulations as well as technology. It also put forward an array of actionable recommendations for key stakeholders, both public and private, to foster financial innovation, empower entrepreneurs and scale crowdfunding development in the Caribbean.

This assessment is comprehensive, lucid and timely. In essence, it provides a practical ‘road map’ for Caribbean nations to not only unleash the power of crowdfunding, but also to effectively harness it for the benefits of businesses, communities and the wider economy. To develop crowdfunding and make it work for individual countries, a deeper understanding of the evolving local market dynamics, the need of funders and fundraisers, the intricacy of regulatory environments, the robustness of legal system and aspects of technical capability is required. Therefore, as this report advocates, a holistic and ‘ecosystem-based’ approach would be best placed to unlock the potential of crowdfunding in the Caribbean, whilst ensure the development is sustainable and appropriately regulated.

The full report can be seen/downloaded here.