CCA Sends Letter to SEC in Support of Increasing the Regulating Crowdfunding Cap to $5 Million

Read CCA’s Letter to the SEC
in Support of Increasing the Regulating Crowdfunding Cap to $5 Million
On May 29th, Crowdfund Capital Advisor submitted a letter of support for the proposed amendments to Regulation Crowdfunding. In particular we are supportive of:

  • Increasing the maximum raise from $1.07 million to $5 million;
  • Changing the non-accredited investors limits based on the greater of an income or net worth standard;
  • Allowing for the use of crowdfunding vehicles;
  • Increasing the reviewed financial threshold to $500,000 raises and audits to $5 million for initial offerings.

With Data We Can Make Informed Decisions that Support These Changes

For 4 years, we have collected information on all Regulation Crowdfunding offerings via our CCLEAR database. We pull in over 100 public data points on each offering that includes all key financial data metrics as well as company valuations and daily transactional information. This type of data and standardized datasets on private companies never existed before and has now become industry standard. This delivers more transparency into the private capital markets than has ever existed before.

Click Here to Read our Letter to the SEC
Here are Some Key Quotes from Our Letter

“We believe that regulation must scale to fit the size of a business and that an issuer that is not the same in terms of revenue (i.e. millions vs hundreds of millions), complexity (i.e. local operations vs national or international), tax practices (domestic vs international), etc should not be held to the same standards as a public company. This would be overly burdensome for them without providing additional benefit. In essence, the larger the corporation the more complex. The smaller the less complex. We feel that Regulation Crowdfunding does a fair job in terms of trying to balance the needs of the business with the needs of the investor.”

“In the 4 years since Regulation Crowdfunding went into effect, there have been no media stories about fraud. Rather there has been unspoken coverage of the benefit these locally supported businesses have provided.”

“Because companies must disclose how a valuation was determined and potential investors can discuss this on the forum part of an offering page, it provides investors a means to determine whether they agree with that valuation or not (prior to investing).  It cannot be stressed enough how this transparency is unique investor protection in the private capital markets.”

“There has been no fraud. Nor has there has also been no systematic perversion of retail or accredited investors.”

“In interviews conducted with both issuers and portals, it was discovered that the majority of the investors in these offerings had a first or second degree relationship to the issuer and/or industry knowledge about the company’s product, services, IP or technology. Any of these creates a degree of trust that doesn’t exist between investors and public companies, which is why public companies must file detailed disclosures.”

“Based on the crowdfunding data from the last 4 years, the average investment is currently approximately $715.  This is an investment quantum that does not appear to raise immediate concerns of undue concentration risk for most individuals with the appetite and ability to make early stage investments.”

“Finally, the system doesn’t benefit one class of investors over another in an offering as they are all presented the same information which is available from one central location the online investment platform, as opposed other exemptions where individual offering memorandums can be amended over time from one group of investors to another.”

“Put simply, the Regulation Crowdfunding disclosure framework improves issuer conduct and accountability.”

Increasing the cap to $5 million will:

  • “Provide a balanced way for more issuers to raise funds from investors they are closest to, with prescriptive disclosures that inform/protect investors.”
  • “Spread costs out and decrease the fees as a percent of the raise. This not only benefits issuers but investors as their capital investment goes into growing/scaling a company as opposed to paying offering fees.”
  • “Enable larger, mid-sized firms, (that may be more stable and lower risk) to use crowdfunding for expansion capital and  job  creation.  This adds more diversity of risk  levels to the investment landscape which is an investor protection.”
Value of the CCLEAR Database to investors, policy makers and regulators:
Three components within the Regulation Crowdfunding framework reveal how issuers are performing over time and display macro-economic SME trends. These are:
  1. In an initial offering, issuers are required to file disclosures that document the change in their financial wellbeing between the most recent fiscal year and the prior fiscal year.
  2. Annually, firms that have raised funds via crowdfunding must file an annual report that discloses the changes in their financial wellbeing year over year since their raise. And
  3. When follow-on capital is raised the new valuation is disclosed. This tracks unrealized returns over time. Since the beginning of Regulation Crowdfunding, there have been almost 150 companies that have used it for follow on rounds.
Because of this data the CCLEAR Database can provide insight into how the industry is growing, where capital is flowing based on demographics, how economic activity is positively impacted, how jobs are promoted, and more. All of this reduces fraud and decreases cost and risk to investors as well as enabling regulators and policy makers to continue to refine regulation to both improve capital formation and investor protection.
Click Here to Download the 4 Year Analysis of Regulation Crowdfunding
The ”Lack of Transparency” Argument is Moot

People and organizations should not hide behind 80 year old arguments that “investors are unaware” in private transactions. If they do, they clearly haven’t read the Regulation Crowdfunding regulations or analyzed tens of thousands of pages of disclosures or carefully analyzed the data. If they did, they would realize that due to this piece of legislation investors now have access to more data and information to make an informed decision than they ever did before.

It is inaccurate and unfair for any individual or organization to say that there is no transparency in this segment of the private capital markets. There is more data and more prescriptive disclosures than probably anywhere else in the private markets with the exception of Regulation A.

We commend the SEC and its staff for the hard work they are doing to promote the interests of capital formation for startups and small businesses while maintaining the hallmark of investor protection.