Policy Briefing on Oct. 1 @1pm ET: The Main Street Recovery Co-Investment Fund

Policy Briefing on Oct. 1 @1pm ET: The Main Street Recovery Co-Investment Fund

The Main Street Recovery Co-Investment Fund:
How Washington Can Immediately Deliver Matching Capital to Help Local Businesses Recover and Grow

October 1, 2020
1:00 p.m. ET

RSVP Info Below

Investment crowdfunding is gaining momentum and offers a practical solution that Congress or the Federal Reserve can immediately utilize to efficiently and effectively deploy capital to local businesses in diverse communities across America. Join us for this virtual event, where the world’s leading experts and practitioners on investment crowdfunding discuss the proposed Main Street Recovery Co-Investment Fund and the United Kingdom’s successful experience using the co-investment model both pre and during the Covid era.

Speakers:

MODERATORKaren Kerrigan, president & CEO, Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council

Jason Best, Co-Founder and Principal, Crowdfund Capital Advisors

Jeff Lynn, Executive Chairman and Co-Founder, Seedrs (U.K.)

Sherwood Neiss, Co-Founder and Principal, Crowdfund Capital Advisors

The democratization of capital is truly taking hold through investment crowdfunding, which allows small business owners to more efficiently identify and access investors and capital using SEC regulated platforms. “Supercharging” this proven, fraud-free method of raising capital through a federal co-investment fund will help local small businesses recover, rebuild and reinvent themselves in the aftermath of COVID-19. The co-investment fund is a successful model that is currently being deployed in the U.K. (through the Future Fund). The Main Street Recovery Co-Investment Fund would match the capital raised by small businesses on SEC-regulated platforms.

Please join us on Thursday, October 1 to learn more about this innovative idea, the growing momentum behind investment crowdfunding, and to hear about the U.K.’s experience with its Future Fund.  

On September 16, SBE Council and Crowdfund Capital Advisors released the report, Regulation Crowdfunding by Congressional District: A Report Card, which reviews the progress of investment crowdfunding since 2016 and its capability for meeting the significant capital needs of Main Street business and entrepreneurs during and following this challenging period.

As noted in the report, more than 90% of U.S. House congressional districts (393 districts) have had investment crowdfunding offerings, with 700,000 retail investors participating in these diverse offerings across the United States. The average raise per offering is $342,000. Community-focused investing is delivering significant capital to local businesses, and the amount of capital being raised via debt and equity crowdfunding has increased considerably during COVID-19. There has been no fraud reported by the SEC with investment crowdfunding.

Please join us for this exciting discussion about the Main Street Recovery Co-Investment Fund!

RSVP: Register in advance for this meeting:
https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZ0lcuytpzgpGtF1GW-_8GNYkZXcL9h3D-2m  

After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting.

To access or share this event invitation online, please click here.

Regulation Crowdfunding Issuers Need to Comply with Annual Reporting Requirements – Post from our partner LawCloud

The following post is a reprint from our partner LawCloud. LawCloud is a Legal Technology platform that can help a company with legal forms related to not just incorporation by capital formation and compliance. It makes all sorts of complicated legal parts of running a corporation affordable and easy.

ANNUAL REPORTING
A Crucial SEC Requirement

 Filing annual reports with the SEC is a requirement for any business which raises funds through a crowdfund offering using a regulated crowdfunding portal.  The purpose of these reports is to provide investors and the public with an update on important developments with the company and its business.

The crowdfunding industry at large has developed a negligent attitude toward complying with this critical SEC requirement with widespread violations in meeting the simple requirements to file.  Issuers may fail to file annual reports with sufficient updates about their company, supply investors with poor quality financial reports or, as is most often the case, simply choose not to file an annual report at all under the assumption that there are no negative repercussions for violating securities law.

This is discouraging as the SEC requirements are not difficult to comply with when compared to requirements for publicly traded companies.  The SEC’s decision to lighten crowdfunding annual reporting requirements was specifically made in an effort to ease the burden on the less-sophisticated businesses expected to utilize crowdfunding for raising capital.

Issuers in the crowdfunding space seem to have come to regard annual reports as a nuisance rather than an opportunity to communicate new and important information (whether good or bad) to their investors.  This problem has been ongoing for some time; last year in an open letter to the SEC signed by four state Attorneys General, this issue is directly addressed with stern enforcement action recommended:

“The pattern of noncompliance with Reg CF’s disclosure requirements may provide an environment in which fraud and manipulation flourish.  Coupled with data that the SEC has engaged in very limited enforcement activity against Reg CF issuers or the portals who host them, this evidence raises concerns about whether investors are actually receiving the protections Reg CF currently mandates.  The SEC should engage in meaningful enforcement of the disclosure requirements to incentivize issuers to provide this critical information to investors.”

– Xavier Becerra, Attorney General of California

Read the Full Letter
 The growing size of the equity crowdfunding market will likely result in more scrutiny across the board for issuers, platforms, and the individuals involved as it relates to disclosure and compliance issues.  We encourage platforms to assist issuers with understanding the importance of compliance and encourage issuers to be compliant before a fairly simple task becomes a significant business issue. The SEC’s Division of Enforcement has made it clear that “holding individuals accountable is the Commission’s most effective method of achieving deterrence. Experience teaches that individual accountability drives behavior and can also broadly impact corporate culture.”
LAWCLOUD ANNUAL REPORTING SOLUTIONS

Crowdfunding Issuers who have completed and filed their Form C through LawCloud are well aware of the time and cost reductions our Form C tool can provide.  LawCloud also offers a cost-effective Form C-AR (Annual Report) service.  LawCloud helped issuers file over 140 C-ARs in the last two years.  These numbers are encouraging, but when taking into account that over 715 Form Cs were filed in 2019 and 763 were filed in 2018, it begins to highlight the disparity between Form C filers and subsequent C-AR filings.

The following data points from the SEC’s EDGAR database show the discrepancy of annual report filings versus Form C filings.  While not all deals were completed or require annual report filing, there is clearly a shortfall in annual report compliance.


Since Equity Crowdfunding is still relatively new, there has yet to be an enforcement action brought by the SEC against an issuer that has failed to meet its annual reporting requirement.  This is likely not an indicator of the SEC’s ambivalence toward the issue, rather, we interpret the current situation as one that has yet to reach the SEC’s radar given the small size of the market.

With new rule changes going into effect later this year that will permit Reg CF issuers to raise substantially more money, we fully expect that the SEC’s Division of Enforcement will focus more of its attention on this market and any disclosure deficiencies that have been previously ignored.

About LawCloud

LawCloud, previously known as iDisclose, was founded in 2015 and is an industry leading platform in the Crowdfunding and legal disclosure space with major contracts with various law firms as well as platforms such as WaterWorks, Title3Funds, MicroVentures, and FundMe. LawCloud offers legal document solutions for all small businesses, including regulatory documents, transactional documents, HR documents and more.
For more information about LawCloud, visit our website at LawCloud.co

Contact LawCloud Now

SEC Modernizes the Accredited Investor Definition – More Investors can now Participate in Private Capital Markets

Securities & Exchange Commission Updates Definition of Accredited Investor –
Increasing Access  to Private Capital Markets for Investors

According to a press release yesterday, The Securities and Exchange Commission today adopted amendments to the “accredited investor” definition, one of the principal tests for determining who is eligible to participate in our private capital markets.  Historically, individual investors who do not meet specific income or net worth tests, regardless of their financial sophistication, have been denied the opportunity to invest in our multifaceted and vast private markets.  The amendments update and improve the definition to more effectively identify institutional and individual investors that have the knowledge and expertise to participate in those markets.

A SUMMARY OF THE NEWLY EXPANDED ACCREDITED INVESTOR DEFINITION IS BELOW

“Today’s amendments are the product of years of effort by the Commission and its staff to consider and analyze approaches to revising the accredited investor definition,” said Chairman Jay Clayton.  “For the first time, individuals will be permitted to participate in our private capital markets not only based on their income or net worth, but also based on established, clear measures of financial sophistication.  I am also pleased that we have expanded and updated the list of entities, including tribal governments and other organizations, that may qualify to participate in certain private offerings.”

“This is a fundamental shift,” says Sherwood Neiss, Principal at Crowdfund Capital Advisors. “It brings the definition of accredited investor closer in line with what we see in much of the rest of the world: “sophisticated investors.” Investors like finance professors or employees of financial institutions who have knowledge and experience in the private capital markets but don’t meet the income or net worth thresholds shouldn’t be precluded from investments.”

“This adjustment now makes these opportunities available to a broader class of investors and expands the capital markets for issuers,” says Jason Best, Principal at Crowdfund Capital Advisors, “Given the struggles many startups and SMEs have faced given the global pandemic, this should help them access capital where the government stimulus programs have fallen short. A next logical step for the SEC to consider is what several other countries have done and include ‘educationally accredited investors’ including CPA’s, MBAs, JDs and other financials certifications/degrees that include significant financials and/or accounting requirements. We look forward to continuing our dialogue with the Commission on these and other issues.”

The amendments allow investors to qualify as accredited investors based on defined measures of professional knowledge, experience or certifications in addition to the existing tests for income or net worth.  The amendments also expand the list of entities that may qualify as accredited investors, including by allowing any entity that meets an investments test to qualify.

* * *

FACT SHEET
Updating the Accredited Investor Definitions

Aug. 26, 2020

The Securities and Exchange Commission adopted amendments to update and improve the definition of “accredited investor” in the Commission’s rules and the definition of “qualified institutional buyer” in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933.  The amendments to the accredited investor definition add new categories of qualifying natural persons and entities and make certain other modifications to the existing definition.  The amendments to the qualified institutional buyer definition similarly expand the list of eligible entities under that definition.

Background

These amendments are part of the Commission’s ongoing effort to simplify, harmonize, and improve the exempt offering framework, thereby expanding investment opportunities while maintaining appropriate investor protections and promoting capital formation.

In June 2019, the Commission requested public comment on its Concept Release on Harmonization of Securities Offering Exemptions.  In the Concept Release, the Commission requested comments on possible approaches to amending the accredited investor definition, which is a central component of several exemptions from registration, including Rules 506(b) and 506(c) of Regulation D, and plays an important role in other federal and state securities law contexts.  The Concept Release was preceded by a Commission staff report issued in December 2015 on the accredited investor definition, which examined the background and history of the definition and considered comments and recommendations on amending the definition.

After taking into account the views expressed by members of the public and recommendations over the years from various Commission advisory committees and the annual SEC Government-Business Forum on Small Business Capital Formation, the Commission proposed in December 2019 to amend the accredited investor definition.  In March 2020, the Commission continued the harmonization effort by proposing amendments to the exempt offering framework.

Highlights

The amendments revise Rule 501(a), Rule 215, and Rule 144A of the Securities Act.

The amendments to the accredited investor definition in Rule 501(a):

  • add a new category to the definition that permits natural persons to qualify as accredited investors based on certain professional certifications, designations or credentials or other credentials issued by an accredited educational institution, which the Commission may designate from time to time by order.  In conjunction with the adoption of the amendments, the Commission designated by order holders in good standing of the Series 7, Series 65, and Series 82 licenses as qualifying natural persons.  This approach provides the Commission with flexibility to reevaluate or add certifications, designations, or credentials in the future.  Members of the public may wish to propose for the Commission’s consideration additional certifications, designations or credentials that satisfy the attributes set out in the new rule;
  • include as accredited investors, with respect to investments in a private fund, natural persons who are “knowledgeable employees” of the fund;
  • clarify that limited liability companies with $5 million in assets may be accredited investors and add SEC- and state-registered investment advisers, exempt reporting advisers, and rural business investment companies (RBICs) to the list of entities that may qualify;
  • add a new category for any entity, including Indian tribes, governmental bodies, funds, and entities organized under the laws of foreign countries, that own “investments,” as defined in Rule 2a51-1(b) under the Investment Company Act, in excess of $5 million and that was not formed for the specific purpose of investing in the securities offered;
  • add “family offices” with at least $5 million in assets under management and their “family clients,” as each term is defined under the Investment Advisers Act; and
  • add the term “spousal equivalent” to the accredited investor definition, so that spousal equivalents may pool their finances for the purpose of qualifying as accredited investors.

The amendment to Rule 215 replaces the existing definition with a cross reference to the definition in Rule 501(a).

The amendments expand the definition of “qualified institutional buyer” in Rule 144A to include limited liability companies and RBICs if they meet the $100 million in securities owned and invested threshold in the definition.  The amendments also add to the list any institutional investors included in the accredited investor definition that are not otherwise enumerated in the definition of “qualified institutional buyer,” provided they satisfy the $100 million threshold.

The Commission also adopted conforming amendments to Rule 163B under the Securities Act and to Rule 15g-1 under the Exchange Act.

What’s Next?

The amendments and order become effective 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.

Online Investment Platforms Data now available as part of an Alternative Data catalog through Bloomberg

Since the 2012 US JOBS Act, pre-IPO, startup and small businesses have been raising funds online from both retail and accredited investors on investment platforms that are regulated by the SEC and FINRA. Working with these platforms, Crowdfund Capital Advisors collects and aggregates company, offering and transaction data then cleans and normalizes it. This data is now available as part of Bloomberg Enterprise Access Point. The dataset is updated daily, contains over 3,000 offerings and provides insights into over 400 NAICS code industries, current and historic valuations, and much more.


DENVER (PRWEB) AUGUST 18, 2020 — Crowdfund Capital Advisors, a leader in real time private capital markets data in the United States, announced that its data set is now available to Bloomberg Data License clients via Bloomberg Enterprise Access Point. This offers an additional way for the financial industry to discover pre-ipo/startup and small business data.

Pre-IPO, startup and small business offering data can be a primary indicator of the strength of both the startup funding market and local/state/regional economies across the United States. Many investors and analysts find data on private companies difficult if not almost impossible to source. This dataset provides insights into over 400 NAICS code industries, current and historic valuations, earnings and daily investments into offerings. Such data can help make more educated investment decisions.

Crowdfund Capital Advisors normalizes data from thousands of offerings into a single, easily digestible format. Each offering exemption can have different laws, formats and varying levels of difficulty to obtain data. There are over 100 different metrics within the dataset that include: offering date, company description, location, incorporation date, price per share, valuation, capital raised, naics code classification, summary income statement and balance sheets, number of employees and more.

Companies that raise money under some of these exemptions file annual reports that contain updated information on their financial wellbeing which can track performance over time. Others leverage these exemptions over time to raise capital and revealing how valuations change over time as well.

Crowdfund Capital Advisors has been collecting, enriching and normalizing pre-ipo/startup and small business data for online offerings completed under the 2012 JOBS Act. These offerings include 506c (accredited investor online offerings), Regulation A, and Regulation Crowdfunding since 2016. Crowdfund Capital Advisors is now updating over 3,000 private offerings from over 890 locations across the United States on a daily basis. This frequency, along with millions of records enriched each year, provides an invaluable data resource for clients in the financial sector.

Launched in September 2018, Bloomberg Enterprise Access Point is the company’s web-based data marketplace that allows Data License clients to easily discover, access and immediately use high quality, market leading content from both Bloomberg and third party providers.

About Crowdfund Capital Advisors:
Crowdfund Capital Advisors has created and perfected a data acquisition model that allows it to effectively handle large amounts of data from hundreds of online brokers/dealers as well as online investment platforms. It has proprietary software, built by its own technical team, as well as a large Data Quality team to accomplish this task. Thousands of clients have received information from Crowdfund Capital Advisors to improve their businesses.

Sherwood Neiss
Principal
Crowdfund Capital Advisors
(877) 427-2350 ext: 701
sherwood@theccagroup.com

SOURCE Crowdfund Capital Advisors
Related Links: http://www.theccagroup.com

Regulation Crowdfunding has Best Month in History – July Sees Record Investments, Offerings and Investors

Online Investment Sees the Highest Month of Activity in July
Small Firms Most Affected by COVID-19 Find Ready Investors and Capital
The Time is Now for Washington to Invest Alongside the Crowd
Online investment by both retail and accredited investors into startups and small businesses was legalized by the JOBS Act in 2012. Regulation Crowdfunding, one of the provisions in the Act, allows firms to raise up to $1.07 million online each year and went into effect in May 2016. The industry was slow to gain traction but 4 years later, momentum is building. July, which has typically been one of slowest months, saw records for the highest number of offerings in a single month, the highest amount of commitments, as well as the highest number of investors.

Our data analysis signals a few things:

  1. Based on the number of firms that reference COVID-19, many companies are coming online to search for capital where they can’t get it from banks or government programs like the Payroll Protection Program (PPP). We expect this to continue.
  2. Based on the number of firms that are more than 3 years old and are revenue generating, companies see online finance as a viable alternative that puts them in control of their fundraising efforts as opposed to relying on a bank or venture capital.
  3. Market awareness about this new method of raising funds is finally gaining traction and expanding at a rate we have yet to see.

—————————————————————————————————————–
Here is how July 2020 compares:

Offerings:

  • July is typically the second slowest month for new offerings.
  • This July was the highest month of new offerings since the industry started with 128 new offerings. This was 74 more offerings than July 2019 or a 137% increase.
  • The next month closest to that was October 2019 with 100 new offerings.
  • Since the launch of Regulation Crowdfunding there have 2,768 offerings. Of all these offerings 11% happened in the first quarter of this fiscal year.

Commitments:

  • July was the highest month of investor commitments at $23.2 million. The next closest month was October 2019 with $18.5 million. (See chart below)
  • June and May of this year were the 3rd and 4th highest months of commitments.
  • The first quarter of this fiscal year saw more commitments than the entire first year of Regulation Crowdfunding.
  • We expect this trend to continue throughout the year.

Investors:

  • July was the highest month of investors with more than 40,000.
  • According to interviews with the platforms and issuers, 80% of investors are retail and 20% are accredited and 80% of capital comes from friends, family, customers and followers.
  • October 2019 was the second highest at 39,400.
  • There have been more investors in the first quarter of this fiscal year than the first seven quarters of Regulation Crowdfunding.
  • This proves that there is an appetite among local investors to support their local businesses as more than just customers but as investors as well.


The figures above indicate that we are probably at the tipping point for the industry. More than 70 online investment platforms have registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission to facilitate these offerings. And there has been over $700 million committed to Regulation Crowdfunding, Regulation A and 506c offerings on these platforms.

According to a SEC report, there has been zero fraud. With the introduction of supporting technology platforms like LawCloud that facilitate offering documents and disclosures, more and more issuers are entering the space with the confidence that fundraising doesn’t have to be as complicated, scary or costly as it used to be. Market awareness is also growing to a point whereby issuers have a choice of which platforms they wish to approach, and platforms are building verticals to differentiate themselves in the space.

Company Statistics:

  • The average number of employees for issuers raising funds in July was 6.4. The average number of employees overall is 3.6.
  • Average revenues for companies raising funds in July was $463,000. The average revenues of all Regulation Crowdfunding companies raising funds online was $342,000.

The growth in both average number of employees as well as average revenues has been a continual trend and shows that more mature companies are turning online for their capital needs. We expect this trend to continue as the SEC proposed raising the limits issuers can raise under both Regulation Crowdfunding and Regulation A+. This will lead to larger firms turning online. (We encourage the SEC to take up the vote and adopt the amendments such that struggling firms can leverage online fundraising).

COVID-19:

  • 13 companies referenced COVID in their fundraising campaigns since March 2020.
  • Some of them provide services like food delivery, some of them were raising funds to make it through the pandemic, some were focused on technologies to enable remote learning, while others were developing diagnostics to test for COVID-19 or other telehealth services.

As we’ve seen in economic downturns in the past, opportunities are flourishing. Many of these companies are trying to survive COVID-19 with the help of community investors while others are launching new products or services to address how we will live in a post-pandemic world. We should be doing more to support these businesses.

How Washington can Help:

While our government is focused on bail-outs for big business what we need is a program to prop up and support local communities/businesses. These entities are responsible for the majority of the jobs and economic activity in cities all across our nation.

It is time for our government to create what the United Kingdom has done, the Future Fund. The Future Fund is a co-investment vehicle that invests alongside the crowd. It doesn’t pick winners but helps support business and jobs that local investors believe in. If we can encourage local businesses to seek capital from their local customers and turn them into investors while adding on government stimulus we’ve accomplished a few things:

  1. We now have a vested group of customers who will frequent those businesses (solving for the problem of how do we get customers back into businesses so they can survive)
  2. We have addressed the credit crunch these local businesses are facing (solving for the capital crisis at the local level that our government cannot address at a macro level)
  3. We have created a process to support local economies (solving for the problem of how do we get Americans back to work).
A co-investment fund will allow Washington to support local businesses in local economies all across the USA without having to pick winners or layering on unreasonable covenants that make business owners decide between taking capital or not (and risking going out of business).
Our government should carve out $1 billion or more to support these businesses.
If they did, they would be having a direct impact on communities all across the nation. Because the crowd is in control, no one should have to worry about “Washington insiders” getting all the money. And because everything is happening online with a digital footprint, we actually have a real-time understanding of where the money is going and how it was used. This type of transparency is built into the system of how Regulation Crowdfunding works and it doesn’t exist in any other stimulus program the government is backing.

If you think our government should carve out $1 billion to co-invest alongside the crowd in supporting local businesses, contact us or contact your representatives and let them know!

CCA’s VentureBeat Article: How crowdfunding is supporting Black livelihoods and communities

The following is a reprint of an article we wrote for VentureBeat that appeared on June 13th. You can find the original here.

The financial challenges facing black entrepreneurs are far reaching. The majority lack the relationships that would get them to either a Silicon Valley VC or a friendly bank loan officer. But Regulation Crowdfunding platforms hold the potential to break down barriers to funding black-founded startups, democratizing access to capital, supporting black livelihoods, decreasing economic inequalities, and supporting communities.

This relatively new source of funding — it debuted four years ago — allows startups and small businesses to raise up to $1,070,000 online per year from the general public, not just accredited investors.

I check in regularly with the various Regulation Crowdfunding platforms on their progress, and this year, their numbers show proportionate representation of Black-led businesses. According to Cencus.gov, as of 2019, 13% of the population was Black. According to George Cook, Co-founder/CEO crowdfunding platform Honeycomb, 11% of all their campaigns have been run by Black founders. And another platform, Seedinvest, has seen 12% of campaigns run by Black founders, according to Aaron Kellner Director of Ventures.

Black founders are also seeing relatively good success rates with their fundraises. According to Ben Blieden, co-founder/CFO of MainVest, 60% of companies with at least one African American founder have had successful raises on its platform, compared to the platform’s average of 63%. The success rate for black founders was 50% on Seedinvest, compared to a 69% average success rate on the platform overall.

And Jonny Price, Director of Fundraising at Wefunder asserts that a higher percentage of capital goes to Black founders through Regulation Crowdfunding campaigns than does from traditional VCs. “Whereas Black founders receive around 1% of venture capital, [they] have received 8% of Wefunder investment volume over the last year.”

Aaron Kellner at Seedinvest told me, “Minority founded/led companies raised on average of about $415K [per company] through the SeedInvest network. This success rate is slightly higher than the platform average overall.”

In a recent blog post, Elizabeth Yin at the Hustle Fund spelled out why VC has been unable to provide these same kinds of opportunities to underserved communities: “A power construct that should worry you, as an entrepreneur, that most people don’t know about: VC funds are only allowed to have 99 investors. There are a couple of exceptions. … But, for the most part, most VC funds can only have 99 investors.  Let’s do the math on that. If you want to raise a $100 million fund, that means that your average check size from an investor in your fund needs to be over $1 million. … The number of people or groups who can easily write a $1 million+ investment check is very few. Power in the investing world is concentrated in the hands of just a few people and that money generally continues to support existing funds and the founders they support who are typically White, Male, graduated from an Ivy League or MIT/Stanford, and worked at a top notch tech company liked Facebook or Google. This is why you don’t see new money or new ideas go into investing. Literally, change is prevented by the laws that are in place.

The principles of crowdfunding are based on egalitarian access to capital. Rather than having capital flow from the ivory tower of Silicon Valley, average Americans can fund a community business they believe in. Members of the crowd can jump in with as little as $10.

According to an article in the Washington Post, There is “a dearth of black investors in venture capital’s upper echelons — where leaders make investment decisions that shape the startup landscape.” This may explain why only 1% of venture capital dollars goes to black startup founders, according to a RateMyInvestor study. In addition, black entrepreneurs lack relationships with banks, which might also explain why black-owned businesses are being shut out of PPP loans, based on an NBC story. Net net, access to capital is a challenge for Black founders in the traditional capital markets.

This doesn’t appear to be the same in Regulation Crowdfunding, where community investors decide which entrepreneurs they want to back.

The good news with crowdfunding is that we don’t need to wait for Washington, DC or Silicon Valley to change. We can do it here and now and at a community level, with community investors in community businesses. In a recent press release, MainVest wrote, “We are able to put real investment dollars into local Black-owned businesses, which will then be repaid as a priority debt obligation against their future revenues. This allows small businesses to survive our current situation and gives people the ability to do good, while also getting a potential return on their investment. It also ensures that revenue created by black-owned businesses stays in the community, increasing the community’s strength, development, and diversity. Which is why it is up to us to support them now to ensure their long-term viability. ​In order to drive equality on a socioeconomic level, we need to take an active role in investing in entrepreneurs in underserved communities, especially when the systemic bias of institutional finance continues to be a barrier.”

If you are interested in supporting Black-owned businesses currently raising money online, here’s a sample list of active Black-founded campaigns:

Company/Campaign Page What do they do? Where they are located?
Battery Xchange On the go charge solution for cell phones Charlotte, North Carolina
Building Economic Advancement Network Corporation Social network that is centered on economic advancement for urban communities Belle Chasse, Louisiana
Charles & Company Organic luxury tea Long Beach, California
Daleview Biscuit and Beer Brewery/Café Brooklyn, New York
Deuce Drone Deuce Drone designs, builds, and operates drone delivery systems, enabling same-day delivery for retailers Boston, Massachusetts
Dome Audio Producing proprietary, disruptive technology headphones for music lovers around the world Rahway, New Jersey
ecoText A digital textbook subscription for college students. Creating Opportunity Through Affordability Dover, New Hampshire
Green Growth Real Estate LLC Cannabis Real Estate Washington, DC
Hemp Real Estate Investments Inc Hemp Real Estate Investments Atlanta, Georgia
Love Conquers All Health and Beauty Salon Astoria, New York
Nuurez Inc Buying real estate to make permanent AirBnB and temporary rentals Kissmmee, Florida
Smokey Vale Salon/Barbershop Brooklyn, New York
Sol Cinema Cafe Coffee shop & Cinema New York, New York
Strong’s Cleaners Dry cleaner Pittsburg, Pennsylvania
The Boogie Down Grind Thematic cafe/bar Bronx, New York
Watch Party The Watch Party app makes it easy for friends to connect and share their passion for TV. Allston, Massachusetts

CCA Sends Letter to SEC in Support of Increasing the Regulating Crowdfunding Cap to $5 Million

Read CCA’s Letter to the SEC
in Support of Increasing the Regulating Crowdfunding Cap to $5 Million
On May 29th, Crowdfund Capital Advisor submitted a letter of support for the proposed amendments to Regulation Crowdfunding. In particular we are supportive of:

  • Increasing the maximum raise from $1.07 million to $5 million;
  • Changing the non-accredited investors limits based on the greater of an income or net worth standard;
  • Allowing for the use of crowdfunding vehicles;
  • Increasing the reviewed financial threshold to $500,000 raises and audits to $5 million for initial offerings.

With Data We Can Make Informed Decisions that Support These Changes

For 4 years, we have collected information on all Regulation Crowdfunding offerings via our CCLEAR database. We pull in over 100 public data points on each offering that includes all key financial data metrics as well as company valuations and daily transactional information. This type of data and standardized datasets on private companies never existed before and has now become industry standard. This delivers more transparency into the private capital markets than has ever existed before.

Click Here to Read our Letter to the SEC
Here are Some Key Quotes from Our Letter

“We believe that regulation must scale to fit the size of a business and that an issuer that is not the same in terms of revenue (i.e. millions vs hundreds of millions), complexity (i.e. local operations vs national or international), tax practices (domestic vs international), etc should not be held to the same standards as a public company. This would be overly burdensome for them without providing additional benefit. In essence, the larger the corporation the more complex. The smaller the less complex. We feel that Regulation Crowdfunding does a fair job in terms of trying to balance the needs of the business with the needs of the investor.”

“In the 4 years since Regulation Crowdfunding went into effect, there have been no media stories about fraud. Rather there has been unspoken coverage of the benefit these locally supported businesses have provided.”

“Because companies must disclose how a valuation was determined and potential investors can discuss this on the forum part of an offering page, it provides investors a means to determine whether they agree with that valuation or not (prior to investing).  It cannot be stressed enough how this transparency is unique investor protection in the private capital markets.”

“There has been no fraud. Nor has there has also been no systematic perversion of retail or accredited investors.”

“In interviews conducted with both issuers and portals, it was discovered that the majority of the investors in these offerings had a first or second degree relationship to the issuer and/or industry knowledge about the company’s product, services, IP or technology. Any of these creates a degree of trust that doesn’t exist between investors and public companies, which is why public companies must file detailed disclosures.”

“Based on the crowdfunding data from the last 4 years, the average investment is currently approximately $715.  This is an investment quantum that does not appear to raise immediate concerns of undue concentration risk for most individuals with the appetite and ability to make early stage investments.”

“Finally, the system doesn’t benefit one class of investors over another in an offering as they are all presented the same information which is available from one central location the online investment platform, as opposed other exemptions where individual offering memorandums can be amended over time from one group of investors to another.”

“Put simply, the Regulation Crowdfunding disclosure framework improves issuer conduct and accountability.”

Increasing the cap to $5 million will:

  • “Provide a balanced way for more issuers to raise funds from investors they are closest to, with prescriptive disclosures that inform/protect investors.”
  • “Spread costs out and decrease the fees as a percent of the raise. This not only benefits issuers but investors as their capital investment goes into growing/scaling a company as opposed to paying offering fees.”
  • “Enable larger, mid-sized firms, (that may be more stable and lower risk) to use crowdfunding for expansion capital and  job  creation.  This adds more diversity of risk  levels to the investment landscape which is an investor protection.”
Value of the CCLEAR Database to investors, policy makers and regulators:
Three components within the Regulation Crowdfunding framework reveal how issuers are performing over time and display macro-economic SME trends. These are:
  1. In an initial offering, issuers are required to file disclosures that document the change in their financial wellbeing between the most recent fiscal year and the prior fiscal year.
  2. Annually, firms that have raised funds via crowdfunding must file an annual report that discloses the changes in their financial wellbeing year over year since their raise. And
  3. When follow-on capital is raised the new valuation is disclosed. This tracks unrealized returns over time. Since the beginning of Regulation Crowdfunding, there have been almost 150 companies that have used it for follow on rounds.
Because of this data the CCLEAR Database can provide insight into how the industry is growing, where capital is flowing based on demographics, how economic activity is positively impacted, how jobs are promoted, and more. All of this reduces fraud and decreases cost and risk to investors as well as enabling regulators and policy makers to continue to refine regulation to both improve capital formation and investor protection.
Click Here to Download the 4 Year Analysis of Regulation Crowdfunding
The ”Lack of Transparency” Argument is Moot

People and organizations should not hide behind 80 year old arguments that “investors are unaware” in private transactions. If they do, they clearly haven’t read the Regulation Crowdfunding regulations or analyzed tens of thousands of pages of disclosures or carefully analyzed the data. If they did, they would realize that due to this piece of legislation investors now have access to more data and information to make an informed decision than they ever did before.

It is inaccurate and unfair for any individual or organization to say that there is no transparency in this segment of the private capital markets. There is more data and more prescriptive disclosures than probably anywhere else in the private markets with the exception of Regulation A.

We commend the SEC and its staff for the hard work they are doing to promote the interests of capital formation for startups and small businesses while maintaining the hallmark of investor protection.

VIDEO: How to Save America’s Small Businesses/Local Economies by Turning Customers into Investors

8 Minute Video: How to Save America’s Small Businesses by Turning Customers into Investors
Last week we were interviewed by Devin Thorpe who is also a contributing author to Forbes about how to get customers back into businesses. Our idea, for the next stimulus package, is a fund that would co-invest alongside the crowd in Main Street businesses that have been hit hard by the pandemic.

You can see the video explaining the idea by clicking the image below.

Sherwood Neiss’ interview with Devin Thorpe
Let Congress Know You Support the Co-Investment Fund Idea
Many of you have asked us how you can help promote the co-investment fund idea. Help us by sending a letter to your Congressional representatives. You can click the image below to do so. Then copy and paste the summary of the framework below the image.
If you want to contact your congressional member directly (or state or local government official) and need talking points, contact us. We’d be happy to share what we are sending around.

SEC Makes Emergency Amendment to Regulation Crowdfunding Rules to Help Restore America’s Small Businesses

SEC Makes Emergency Amendment to
Regulation Crowdfunding Rules to Help Restore America’s Small Businesses
and How YOU Can Help Get America Back on Her Feet
According to a press release “The Securities and Exchange Commission is providing temporary, conditional relief for established smaller companies affected by COVID-19 that may look to meet their urgent funding needs through a Regulation Crowdfunding offering. [These] actions, which follow suggestions made by members of the SEC’s Small Business Capital Formation Advisory Committee, will expedite the offering process for eligible companies by providing relief from certain rules with respect to the timing of a company’s offering and the financial statements required.  To take advantage of the temporary rules, a company must meet enhanced eligibility requirements and provide clear, prominent disclosure to investors about its reliance on the relief. The relief will apply to offerings launched between the effective date of the temporary rules and Aug. 31, 2020.”

“In the current environment, many established small businesses are facing challenges accessing urgently needed capital in a timely and cost-effective manner,” said SEC Chairman Jay Clayton. “Today’s action responds to feedback we have received from our Small Business Capital Formation Advisory Committee and others about the difficulties these companies may face in conducting an offering within a time frame that meets pressing capital needs, while continuing to provide appropriate protections for investors.

Key changes include the following:

  1. Companies raising up to $250,000 will only need to self-certify the financials as opposed to spending time and money on a comprehensive CPA review
  2. Removing this will expedite the process to list an offering
  3. 21 days waiting period to take commitments has been temporarily removed and
  4. Offerings can close sooner than the campaign deadline date as long as the target offering amount has been reach
To read the comprehensive temporary amendment to the rules click here.
Let Congress Know You Support the
Co-Investment Fund Idea
Many of you have asked us how you can help promote the co-investment fund idea. Help us by sending a letter to your Congressional representatives. You can click the image below to do so. Then copy and paste the summary of the framework below the image.

The USA Public-Private Partnership to Save Small Business

SUMMARY

This program would create a co-funding facility specifically for Main Street USA businesses. The federal government would match up to $250,000 per business, in funds raised from their communities via private sector online funding platforms that are currently permitted by the JOBS Act, passed by bipartisan majorities in 2012. Online financing started in 2016 and since then, communities have raised over $370,000,000 for American small businesses, with no fraud.

WHY IS THIS PROGRAM NEEDED?

This powerful program tackles many of the problems with the existing stimulus programs to efficiently and transparently deliver capital to true small businesses across the U.S. because it:

  • Is permitted under existing securities policy and SEC regulation.

  • Engages local communities to support local businesses they believe in.
  • Can benefit up to 500,000 Main Street businesses within 60 days allowing for the re-employing of million Americans.
  • Leverages existing multiple private-sector technology platforms that:
    • Have experienced NO FRAUD in 4+ years.
    • Were built specifically to deliver funding to small businesses.
    • Do not rely on one system (the SBA loan process) that crashes frequently.
  • Provides transparency and weekly reporting of all loans/investments.
  • Provides an alternative funding resource to small businesses in need.
  • Focuses on Main Street USA Businesses which will, by default, prevent large enterprises that need large sums of capital from using this program.
  • Replicates a similar, very successful program in the United Kingdom.

WHAT ARE THE NEXT STEPS TO ENACT THIS PROGRAM?

  1. Agree that a co-funding facility for American small businesses can create jobs, save small businesses and rebuild  local economies.
  2. Approve funding for a “Phase 1 Program” (a $20 billion program would benefit up to 80,000 small businesses).
  3. Include language in the next recovery bill that clarifies the JOBS Act regarding these types of collective funding vehicles are explicitly permitted.
  4. Approve the framework that explains how existing portals may register, businesses may apply, determines targets and specifies fund distribution timeline and requirements.
  5. Use existing data standards and reporting to create transparency via weekly reporting to federal/state governments and the public.

The $62.5 Billion Dollar Main Street Co-Investment Fund that could reemploy 20 Million Americans within 60 Days

While well intentioned, a significant portion of the first round of PPP funds did not reach Main Street businesses. We need to expand a financing service already up and running in the US since 2016 that is 1) targeted at true small businesses;  2) fast – that can be rolled out in 60 days or less; and 3) harnesses communities in partnership with the government to reopen businesses that we all count on in our daily lives. How do we know it will work? The British government has run a similar program for the last 4 years with great success and no fraud.

The Federal Government can form a partnership with online investment platforms to leverage the power of Regulation Crowdfunding (Reg CF) to immediately launch a $62.5 billion dollar co-investment fund. Reg CF allows small businesses to raise money from any American as long as companies provide disclosures and leverage platforms that are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This tool has been in the works for 4 years now and there has been no fraud. Most importantly, it supports small businesses in communities all across the United States in over 80 industries and supplies critically important jobs.

Why $62.5 Billion? Consider this:

  1. According to data from companies that have leveraged Reg CF, the average small business employs around 7 individuals.
  2. Between independent contractors and support vendors that provide critical products and services an additional 49 employees are supported (according to data from Paychex).
  3. This is a total of 54 direct and indirect jobs created and supported by each small business.
  4. If there are 27 million people that filed for unemployment, that’s 500,000 business affected (27 million unemployed / 54 jobs supported per business).
  5. If we assume on average they need $250,000 cash to get back up and running, the crowd comes in with $125,000 and the government matches up to $125,000 that the crowd invested. That’s $62.5 billion from the local community ($125,000 * $500,000 businesses) and $62.5 billion from the government.
  6. Together with the crowd that would be a $125 Billion dollar investment into local communities. These businesses would re-employ those individuals that lost their jobs. The money would reinvigorate these local economies.
  7. The Crowd and government could be repaid in full, with interest, over an agreed upon period of time.

How would it work?
A co-investment debt fund could engage local customers/citizens to invest in local businesses they use and trust. These lenders would have a vested interest in the outcome of the business and hence would be frequent users and brand ambassadors for the business. By investing $1 from the fund for every $1 that came from the crowd, the cash infusion would double and the oversight would be greater than traditional debt investments from banks.

This type of program could be implemented fairly quickly. Since the technology and regulation is already in place and operating, it could be immediately launched. Since the platforms that exist are already registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as well as FINRA these platforms are known entities. The regulation already requires that companies seeking funds have disclosures necessary to inform investors so investors aren’t making blind decisions. And the framework requires that companies exceed minimum funding targets that they set, so if a company fails to reach its minimum funding target, no money is transferred to them and the crowd doesn’t lose. A co-investment fund could start as a trial and then expand if successful, thus mitigating risk and also increase speed to market.

Strategy 
The Federal government would work with online investment platforms to co-lend to America’s small businesses and entrepreneurs. The loans could be up to $500,000 with the crowd able to fund up to $250,000 and the Federal Government to match the loans, dollar for dollar, up to $250,000. (A majority of the loans would be less than $500,000 … with the mean loan being around $250,000 with half coming from the local community).

In 2012, the JOBS Act was enacted on a bipartisan basis to create new sources of funding for small businesses and entrepreneurs. There are now over 50 online funding platforms that  enable entrepreneurs and small businesses to raise money from local investors, customers, and fans. These funding portals enable businesses to raise money via debt or equity (stock) instruments. The platforms are licensed and regulated by the SEC and FINRA. This provides infrastructure to activate this program immediately.

Investment Instruments Available
While there is no limit on the type of securities a company may issue under Reg CF, it is suggested that initially, bonds, debt and revenue-based financing vehicles would be the types of securities for this pilot program.

Repayment Process
This program would be similar in structure to the PPP program, but more targeted to small businesses.

  • The maximum funding is to be determined by the Federal Government. If the pilot program is deemed successful, it can choose to expand the program over time.
  • The Federal Government could choose to forgive part or all of their portion of the funding.
  • Funds are repaid in full, first to private investors.
  • The Federal Government is repaid after all private investors have been repaid.
  • The Federal Government can choose to forgive part or all of the loans.  Examples would be to forgive 50% or 75% of the government’s portion of the loan, providing the private sector has been fully repaid on time.

Oversight
As with any type of financing, oversight is critical. The following key levers will provide oversight for the program:

  1. Fund manager provides oversight on fund operations and works with the fund administrator to deliver periodic reporting to the appropriate government agency on fund performance and operations.
  2. Fund managers engage with platforms to provide oversight.
  3. Portals provide oversight on individual company diligence.
  4. Community investors provide oversight on company performance.

We need bold action now.  This program can quickly deliver capital to the small businesses that puts millions of Americans back to work, and delivers services that everyone will depend on to start feeling some sense of normalcy back in our lives.

For details of a draft plan, contact us.

Innovative Way Federal (or State) Government(s) Can Support Small/Medium Enterprises During the COVID Cash Crunch – A $250 Million Co-Investment Fund

After almost 4 years in action, Regulation Crowdfunding has not only proven to be a successful model for investing into startups and small businesses but how such investments can mitigate risk, invigorate local economies and provide critical jobs. Since May 2016, almost half a million individuals have invested over $360 million via Regulation Crowdfunding into 1,4000 businesses in over 80 industries across the United States. Despite the collapse of the public markets since the beginning of the Coronavirus pandemic, the private markets have been resilient. This is some positive news as now is the most critical time for small businesses that are struggling to stay afloat, are in a cash crunch and have nowhere to turn as government programs for small businesses run out of fuel. Crowdfunding platforms like Wefunder and Nextseed have created programs to leverage the power of the crowd to assist businesses during the COVID crisis. But there is more that our government can do … and not as a bailout but as a partner to small businesses. The government could leverage one of the tools in its tool chest, the Small Business Investment Company (SBIC) program, to develop a new $250 million co-investment fund that will invest alongside the crowd where campaigns hit their funding targets. If the government invested $1 for every dollar that was invested into local economies, that would be a half a billion dollar boost to regions of the country that are most impacted. Think about that in terms of economic activity and jobs.

Why the SBIC Program?

This isn’t about creating something new that the government is unfamiliar with. This is about finding something the government is already doing and expanding it to apply to the current crisis. It is also about layering on new methodologies (i.e. Regulation Crowdfunding) to existing practices such that the risk is less for the government. The SBIC is a program that helps finance small businesses. An SBIC is a private lending company which is licensed and regulated by the Small Business Association (SBA). SBICs offer venture capital financing to higher-risk small businesses and SBIC loans are guaranteed by the SBA. An added advantage of SBICs for small businesses is that, in addition to funding small business growth and more jobs, SBICs offer management expertise and assistance to companies. SBICs are privately owned and managed investment funds, licensed and regulated by the SBA. These companies use their own capital, along with funds borrowed with an SBA guarantee, to invest in qualifying small businesses. SBICs use a combination of funds raised from private sources and money raised through the use of SBA guarantees to make equity and capital investments in small businesses. The SBA matches SBIC funds at the rate of $2 for every $1 the SBIC puts in.

How Could this Work with Regulation Crowdfunding Platforms?

Crowdfunding platforms could apply with the SBA to be “Limited SBICs.” The approved platforms would have access to the $250 co-investment fund. In order for small businesses to qualify for co-investment funds they must meet certain criteria. For example, it might be required that a crowdfunding campaign hit its minimum funding target or a minimum dollar amount (like $50,000 from the crowd); that a certain number of investors be part of the offering, that those investors have a 1st or 2nd degree connection to the company, etc. Triggers like this will mitigate risk for the government by making sure there is an engaged group of investors looking out not just for the company but their investment as well. In a way, the crowd will act like the SBIC management company by providing capital and oversight.

Companies on the crowdfunding platforms could apply for matching funds from the “Limited SBIC COVID Co-Investment Fund.” Since the crowdfunding platforms don’t handle any funds (funds are held in escrow) they could notify the SBA when a company qualifies. Depending on how much the company has raised, the “Limited SBIC COVID Co-Investment Fund” would come in with a matching investment. This money would be automatically transferred to the company.

Since the crowd is “investing” in these offerings. The government would be investing as well. A popular type of investment vehicle that works well for cash flowing small businesses is a revenue share note. With a revenue sharing note, investors can earn a multiple on their principal, such as 1.2x (each deal has a different potential return). Businesses pay investors a small percent of their monthly revenue (for example 3-6%) over a set period of time (usually 4 years) or until the multiple is paid. Revenue sharing notes could work particularly well for businesses in crisis because when revenue is slow, paybacks (that are based on a percent of revenue) are lower as well. This eases the cash burn on these establishments. Then when business picks up, the note repayments pick up as well. Hence when these COVID affected businesses are back up and running, customers will be short-term investors, we will have saved local economies, businesses will have cash to survive and thrive, they will also be generating revenue and be able to repay their loans. Most importantly the money the government put up will be returned to the government with interest as opposed to all these current loan forgiveness programs.

Conclusion

The government could support startups and small businesses affected by COVID (and keep local economies invigorated as well as people employed), by creating a co-investment fund that matches (perhaps $1 dollar by US Government to every $1 by the crowd) into local businesses that raise funds to keep them going.  A $250 million co-investment fund could then equate to $500 million invested into local economies. The government won’t be taking all the risk. The community is sharing in this risk. And because these local investors have a stake in the outcome of these local businesses, they will visit them and be marketing agents for them such that they thrive (and the investors get a return on their investment).

If this seems innovative, it isn’t. Right now, governments like Malaysia already do this with any company that is raising funds under their equivalent Regulation Crowdfunding regimes. Now is the time for fast acting solutions, this could be one of them.

 

Crowdfunding Update – How Regulation Crowdfunding Stood up to the First Weeks of Coronavirus –Almost Opposite of the Public Markets

The Coronavirus is taking the financial markets by storm. It began its attack on the public markets around February 12th. Since then, the markets have dropped 30% off their highs and have made wide swings from one day to the next. It has been one of the most volatile periods in history. While we have yet to see how everything will play out, it is encouraging to see that this volatility has seemingly not had the same impact on private funding online. The data shows that people are still investing in their local businesses via online platforms. And their numbers are growing year over year. This will play an important role as we emerge out of this pandemic. We wanted to understand what is happening, so we dug into the data, reached out to a few platforms, and this is what we learned.

Since February 12th, over $11.6 million has been invested into over 320 active companies, who are raising money on 13 online investment platforms. Over 21,000 investors have made individual investments into these companies. Comparing this to the same period last year, $9.8 million was invested into 227 active companies on 17 platforms by over 11,000 investors. There were 41% more active companies during the same period last year. The amount invested was up 16.3%, and the number of investors engaged was up 90%. All of these select private market indicators were up despite the public markets being in a free fall.

The image below shows period over period activity from February 12th to March 18th. What we see is that, despite the volatility in the public markets, this segment of the private capital markets appears to be withstanding the negative impacts … for now.

There have been several breakout companies during this period of public volatility. The list below shows the top 10, who they are, where they are based, where they are raising funds, and how much they’ve raised during this period.

Company City Listing URL Amount Raised Between 2/12/20 and 3/18/20
Mightly Quinn’s Passaic https://www.seedinvest.com/mightyquinns/series.b  $1,075,619
Lost Spirits Vernon https://wefunder.com/lost.spirits  $1,070,000
Black Sands Entertainment Brooklyn https://wefunder.com/black.sands.entertainment  $480,000
Ample Foods San Francisco https://republic.co/ample-foods  $295,836
McSquares Denver https://wefunder.com/mcSquares_The_Art_Of_Whiteboarding  $282,207
Neurohacker Carlsbad https://wefunder.com/neurohacker  $277,529
Called Higher Studios Franklin https://www.startengine.com/called-higher-studios  $274,730
GenesisAI Allston https://wefunder.com/genesis.ai  $263,725
Copperworks Distilling Seattle https://wefunder.com/copperworks.distilling  $259,637
Fisher Wallace New York https://www.startengine.com/fisherwallace  $249,693

We asked some of the platforms for their thoughts on why the private capital markets might be operating differently from the public ones. Ryan Feit, CEO of SeedInvest, shared an interesting perspective. As he put it: “Sentiment is good. Venture will freeze up and entrepreneurs will need to utilize alternative sources of capital more than ever. On the investor front, the public markets will undoubtedly take a toll but given that the private markets have a low correlation to public and with interest rates at zero, hopefully people will continue to shift capital away from traditional assets.”

Chuck Pettid, CEO Republic Crowdfunding Portal, said “Investors may be starting to turn more to private markets because their numbers don’t move so rapidly as we’ve seen in the public markets.” Over the past week he’s heard that “Investors are looking for more long-term stability and when I see this being repeated it ends up being a theme.” Given the high volatility in the public markets this might be a reason to increase one’s diversification. “Sure some startups will fail but not in one day,” he says “it will take time.” When asked why he thinks people are investing, he shared “People are looking to diversify while some are investing strictly out of support. They want these businesses to be around and these investors can play an important part in America getting back on her feet.” When asked if he’s sees any correlation between the markets he remarked that the periods where the stock markets took deep dives, they saw very little investments happening on their platform but when it picked up, so did their volume. And while investors in this segment of the private markets can cancel their investments he acknowledged that they are seeing very little of that.

Jonny Price, Director of Fundraising at Wefunder felt “It is too early to tell. While he could certainly see how this crisis would lower investment volume March 2020 has been is our best month ever already.” He also agreed with Pettid and Feit above by stating, “You can make a case that when the stock market is crashing, investors will seek alternative investment opportunities. And when conventional sources of capital dry up (e.g. VC), more founders might turn to their fans and customers for capital.” His last thought was most poignant, “High level — if there was ever a historical moment for a democratic and people-powered financial system, this would seem to be it.”

We will continue to monitor this segment of the private capital markets to see how they are impacted. We will also share with you stories coming from both the platforms and the companies raising money on them that are focused on COVID-19. In the meantime, it is heartening to see that investments haven’t trailed off. At some point we will come out of this downturn, when we do these startups and small businesses will play an important role in helping to reinvigorate local economies and provide valuable jobs. Two of the things that seem most impacted by the coronavirus to date.